Capitalism in Crisis?

At a time when financial markets globally appear nervous, and people increasingly look at the capitalist economic ideals with suspicion; I want to share some expert perspectives from the masters and proponents of capitalism, who had clearly forewarned us about the pitfalls that have caused the ongoing mess.

Authors Raghuram R. Rajan and Luigi Zingales, in their seminal work, 'Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists' conclude that “Politics—for better or worse—lays the foundations for markets, and thus for prosperity. For creative destruction, sustained by free markets, is the elixir that has let the free enterprise system flourish for so many years. Yet the disruptions that creative destruction spawns sometimes prove too big for a free society to survive without a safety net. Markets need to be preserved against their biggest enemy: Themselves. Markets need a heart for their own good.”

Louis O. Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler in their book 'The New Capitalists' describe the functions of an investment banker under a financed capitalist plan as the following:

- “The investment-banker function in the present mixed economy has been aptly described by Professor Merwin H. Waterman as that of a “transporter” of funds from the “savers” to those who would use the funds in capital formation.”

- “Far more important than the mere selling to corporations of their influence with or access to the owners of concentrated savings would be the functioning of the investment banker as the “attending physician” at the birth of new productive capital instruments and of new firms employing them. In this capacity, the investment banker would be charged with qualifying the stocks of new enterprises, or of existing enterprises seeking new capital, for financing through the financed-capitalist program. This function of investment bankers we might call their “entrepreneurial service” function. Thus their functions in this capacity would involve the articulation of the work of engineers, accountants, lawyers, marketing experts and all others whose services are required so to plan, design, and establish either a new enterprise or additions to existing enterprises that the newly formed capital will in fact “throw off” or produce the wealth that is expected of it. No service in the economy would be in greater demand or have greater importance than this function of the investment banker.”

The authors had forewarned us about the moral hazards of speculation and vested interests:

- “Speculation in stocks is both tolerated and encouraged today because of the lack of understanding of the nature of a capitalist economy. It is neither more necessary nor more justifiable to encourage speculation in securities representative of the means of production than it would be to gamble with the labor power of workers—the other active factor of production. The principles of economic justice, which are central to a capitalist economy, assert that wealth should be distributed to those who produce it. They also imply that the acquisition of wealth, other than through voluntary gifts, or genuine changes in value through changes in supply or demand, by those who contribute nothing to its production, is the height of injustice. The common justification for secondary-market speculation, aside from the necessity for orienting business transactions to ill-conceived tax laws, is that an active secondary market is necessary to “season” the securities of various corporations so that issuers can thereafter more easily obtain new capital when they seek it. This defense of the speculative stock market is almost groundless, since only a minute portion of new capital formation is derived from the issuance of stock to investors in the market.”

- “However, the enticement to finance the acquisition of new capital estates would far more than offset the tendency to suppress speculation, in terms of the volume of securities handled by investment houses or brokerage houses and stock exchanges. One of the goals of a capitalist economy is the financing of new capital formation entirely through the issuance of equity stocks directly to individual investors. The extent to which this would increase the volume of securities outstanding is incalculably great. Nor can there be any doubt of the desirability of a sound and active secondary market, in which market value would reflect, predominantly if not exclusively, the wealth-producing history and prospects—in the opinion of buyers and sellers—of the capital represented by such stocks”.

Martin Wolf in a January 2008 article in FT explained that “the world has witnessed well over 100 significant banking crises over the past three decades. The authorities have even had to rescue important parts of the US financial system - on most counts, the world's most sophisticated - four times during the same period: from the developing country debt and "savings and loan" crises of the 1980s to the commercial property crisis of the early 1990s and now the subprime and securitized-credit crisis of 2007-08. No industry has a comparable talent for privatising gains and socialising losses. Participants in no other industry get as self-righteously angry when public officials - particularly, central bankers - fail to come at once to their rescue when they get into (well-deserved) trouble. Yet they are right to expect rescue. They know that as long as they make the same mistakes together - as "sound bankers" do - the official sector must ride to the rescue. Bankers are able to take the economy and so the voting public hostage. Governments have no choice but to respond.”

Thanks Raghuram R. Rajan and Luigi Zingales; Martin Wolf of FT; and Louis O. Kelso and Mortimer J. Adler